Home > Radical Islam, Wars and Rumors of War > “Sex Jihad” Fatwa Permits Incest In Syria

“Sex Jihad” Fatwa Permits Incest In Syria

05/02/2014 Leave a comment Go to comments

For perverted peaceful purposes …

Revelation 9:21, “And they did not repent of their murders … or their sexual immorality …”

By Raymond Ibrahim, FrontPage Mag – “Last year, according to Arabic media accounts, ‘Saudi cleric Nasser al-‘Umar issued a fatwa permitting mujahidin [jihadis] in Syria to have sex-jihad with their sisters [muharamhum] if no one else is available.  The Saudi preacher also praised the mujahidin for their ongoing fight against, in his words, the machine of infidelity and oppression, that is, the Syrian and Iranian regimes.’

The cleric issued his fatwa on ‘one of the channels associated with the radical jihadi movements’ where he also reportedly said: ‘Some today are opposing the fatwas being issued by the clerics which serve our mujahidin brethren fighting in Syria [a likely reference to Muslim criticism — as opposed to Western denial — of the sex–jihad fatwas], without criticizing the killing of children and women in Syria.’

 As shocking as this report may seem, it is not the first of its kind. For example, according to this Arabic documentary video (click ‘cc’ for English subtitles), ‘The new jihad allows brothers and sisters in Syria belonging to the [al-Qaeda linked] al-Nusra Front to marry each other under the name of jihad because of the lack of girls among fighters of that organization.’

One man appears on video saying, ‘At the Zawia mountain there is an imam called Imam Hussein. They bring him a brother and a sister, he says ‘Allahu Akbar’ on them three times to have sex together and make them husband and wife.’

The rationale and justification of these fatwas is based on the Islamic maxim, ‘necessity makes the prohibited permissible,’ not unlike the more familiar adage, ‘the ends justify the means.’

In other words, because fighting to make the ‘word of Allah,’ or Sharia, supreme is the greatest good, and because sexually-deprived jihadis fighting to do just that may lose morale and quit the theatre of war for lack of women, it is permissible, indeed laudable, for Muslim women — including apparently relatives — to volunteer to give up their bodies to these men so that they can continue the jihad to empower Islam, in accordance with the Koran: ‘Allah has purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain’ (Yusuf Ali trans. 9:111).’ Read more.

Flashback: Demented: Saudi Cleric Issues New Fatwa Allowing Syrian Rebels To Rape Women To Solve Their ‘Sexual Problems’ – “The Saudi preacher, Muhammed al-Arifi, has issued a special fatwa that solves the sexual problems of the Mujahideen after he expressed his annoyance with the deprivation of the fighters of Islam, who are fighting in Syria alongside the armed opposition forces, from the earthly pleasures. He clarified that it has been two years since the Jihadists last were with women. Al-Arifi’s fatwa allows the fighters in Syria to engage in a marriage, which he called ‘intercourse marriage’ and that lasts for a few hours, from Syrian females, in order to give each fighter a turn…” Read more.

Flashback: Islamic Cleric Issues New Fatwa Permitting The Rape Of Non-Sunni Women In Syria – “Yet another Islamic cleric recently made it permissible for the Islamic fighters waging a jihad in Syria—politely known as ‘the opposition’—to rape the nation’s women. Salafi Sheikh Yasir al-‘Ajlawni, a Jordanian of origin who lived in Damascus, Syria for 17 years, posted a YouTube video last week where he said he was preparing to issue a ‘legitimate fatwa’ making it legal (in the eyes of Islam) for those Muslims fighting to topple secular president Bashar Assad and install Sharia law to ‘capture and have sex with’ all non-Sunni women …” Read more.

Categories: Radical Islam, Wars and Rumors of War
  1. joylifepeace's avatar
    abundantlife
    05/02/2014 at 2:24 PM
    Reply

    Reblogged this on ABUNDANT LIFE LIVING and commented:
    Those who are in enslaved to the spirit of depravity, Islam: REPENT! Seek Jesus Christ of Nazareth! This fatwa is EVIL and WICKED! Repent! Seek the ONE TRUE GOD and repent of your sins!

    Like

    • Ahmed Arabi's avatar
      Ahmed Arabi
      10/13/2014 at 8:01 AM
      Reply

      wrong, no god but Allah. these evil fatwas is fabricated by you christian evils. no muslims would imagine saying this at all..

      Like

  2. Mark McDonald's avatar
    Mark McDonald
    05/02/2014 at 3:58 PM
    Reply

    and when the baby is born with defects, the man stands on the baby neck until dead

    Like

  3. Ahmed Arabi's avatar
    Ahmed Arabi
    10/13/2014 at 7:58 AM
    Reply

    What is stated above is all false, not true. No Muslim, not Al Umar nor Al Arifi or anyone else would commit this lie on Allah. You, who forger or create from scratch or imagine these fatwas. All lies, and Allah will burn you in Hell until you bring the truth that you admit you ffabricated this, then he will burn you more and more. .

    Like

  4. ICA's avatar
    ICA
    10/13/2014 at 3:11 PM
    Reply

    Ahmed Arabi, “no god but Allah.”

    Hi Ahmed, there is only One God. His name is Yahweh, the one true God of the Bible. What you need to know is that the Bible is a collection of 66 different Divinely-inspired books that were written over a period of 1,500 years by 40 different authors. The Qur’an, on the other hand, is just 1 book that was written (recited) over a period of 23 years by 1 man named Mohammed who, according to Muslim sources, thought he was demon possessed, tried to commit suicide and at times even believed he was under a magic spell. A couple of points:

    First, Islam teaches you that the Bible was at one time the Word of God, but was later changed. Let’s think about this logically, however. If the Bible was changed, then according to Islam an All-Knowing and All-Powerful God was unable to protect His own Word from corruption. But if God is Omniscient and Omnipotent, is He not more than able to protect it? Of course He is. The Qur’an itself even claims that “none can change His Words: for He is the one who heareth and knoweth all” (Sura 6:115-116). So if the Bible was His true Word at some time in the past, and if “none can change His Words” then either the Bible remains His Word, or the Qur’an is wrong. Which is it?

    Second, if “Allah” is the only true God then why is it that he is never mentioned once in the Bible? Even scrolls and Biblical manuscripts that are dated before Mohammed (who said that the Scriptures were not corrupted during his time) never mention “Allah” even once. This makes it quite evident that “Allah” was not the God of Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Isaac, or anyone else in the Bible. Their God was and is Yahweh — a name that never appears as the name of any god outside the Judeo-Christian Scriptures. Moreover, the name “Allah” (which really isn’t even a name) never appears in the Judeo-Christian Scriptures, either. “The word alah does exist in Hebrew but it is not a proper name and it never refers to God. It has three principal meanings: (a) to curse, swear, or adjure; (b) to lament (weep); and (c) to arise, ascend, climb, go away, leap, etc.. It is an indisputable fact that ALLAH does not appear even once as the Name of God, or even of a man, in the Hebrew Scriptures. There is no word ‘alah’ or ‘allah’ in the Greek New Testament at all. It was, quite simply, unknown in the Bible world. To therefore claim that ‘Allah’ was the name of God in the Bible is without one single shred of evidence. God has always been known as Yahweh, or (much less frequently) by the contraction Yah.

    Muslim scholars have gone to great lengths to try and prove that the Arabic ‘Allah’ is, in fact, the same as the Hebrew ‘Eloah’, which is not a proper name and simply translates as ‘God’. The words ‘El’ and ‘Elohim’ also translate the same way, appear far more numerously than Eloah, and may be used to designate either the true God, pagan deities, idols, or even human judges. It is for this reason that I have heard Muslim apologists get annoyed when other Muslins talk about ‘God’ instead of ‘Allah’ because the word ‘God’ can be applied to any religion’s god. They recognise that Allah is a proper name which distinguishes the God of the Muslims from the God of the Jews and Christians, or the gods of the Hindus and others. ‘Eloah’ is, in any case, a derivative of ‘El’ and its plural ‘Elohim’ which doesn’t remotely sound like ‘Allah’. You will not find many (if any) Muslims insisting that they worship the Hebrew Eloah – the only time they ever try to make a connection is when trying to recruit Jews and Christians to Islam. If I were confess that ‘Eloah’ were my God and that Mohammed was his prophet I doubt any Muslim would believe I had converted to Islam.” Read more here.

    Islam has a serious problem on its hands. You see, Mohammed did not believe the Bible was corrupt during his time and even called upon Christians to adhere to the Scriptures they had already possessed. But, according to archaeological discoveries, since the Scriptures we have today are the same Scriptures that Christians had even well before the time of Mohammed, when could the Bible have possibly been corrupted, who corrupted it, and how was it corrupted? The answer: It wasn’t. The same cannot be said for the Qur’an, however, where old Qur’anic texts have been changed over time.

    Ahmed Arabi, “hese evil fatwas is fabricated by you christian evils. no muslims would imagine saying this at all.”

    The real world says otherwise:

    New Fatwa Permits Rape Of Non-Sunni Women In Syria

    Ahmed Arabi, “… Allah will burn you in Hell …”

    How can “Allah” burn someone in Hell when Islam’s deity doesn’t even exist? The deity of Islam is not the creator of the universe. Rather, it is the devil masquerading as God.

    Qur’an Sura 24:35, “Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth… Allah doth guide whom He will to His light…”

    2 Corinthians 11:14-15, “… for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.”

    According to the Bible, “Blessings crown the head of the righteous, but violence overwhelms the mouth of the wicked” (Proverbs 10:6). And violence is all that Islam has ever known, for “Mohammed is [Allah’s] apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers” (Qur’an Sura 48:29). Unfortunately for those who follow Mohammed, “[the Lord] will punish the world for its evil, the wicked for their sins [and will] put an end to the arrogance of the haughty and will humble the pride of the ruthless” (Isaiah 13:11). Islam’s days are numbered.

    Do not be deceived, Ahmed. In the Qur’an, a couple of revealing attributes of “Allah” describe him as being “Supremely Proud” (Quran Sura 59:23) and the greatest of the deceivers (Qur’an Sura 3:54). In the Bible, however, pride is one of the most repulsive evils in the eyes of God (Psalm 10:4, Proverbs 8:13). In fact, the one who was thrown out of Heaven was found to be supremely proud (Isaiah 14:12-15). He is also the one who then deceives the whole earth (Revelation 20:10). The Islamic world knows him as “Allah.” We know him as “Satan.” And his days are numbered, too.

    Revelation 12:9, “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth …”

    Revelation 13:4, “And they worshiped the dragon [Satan], for he had given his authority to the beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying, ‘Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?’”

    Revelation 20:10, “The devil [Satan], who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.”

    There is no God but Yahweh, and Yeshua is His Messiah. Follow Yahweh, Ahmed, the one true God of Heaven. Do not follow “Allah” and his false prophet. Choose this day whom you will serve, for tomorrow may be too late.

    For your consideration, please take a moment to read through this article titled “A Few Simple Questions For Muslim Visitors“. What have you got to lose?

    Like

  1. No trackbacks yet.

The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of MidnightWatcher's Blogspot. Although differences of opinion are welcomed, please refrain from personal attacks and inappropriate language. This blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments that fail to do so.